Under what conditions can the district court reverse or remand a commission's decision?

The district court can reverse or remand a commission's decision if the commission acted fraudulently or arbitrarily. This principle ensures that the administrative processes and decisions made by a commission adhere to standards of fairness, transparency, and legality. Acting fraudulently means that the commission engaged in dishonest or deceptive behavior, which undermines the integrity of its proceedings. Similarly, acting arbitrarily indicates a lack of rationale or reasonable basis for a decision, suggesting that the decision may have been made without proper consideration of the facts or applicable laws.

This provision helps maintain checks and balances on administrative agencies, ensuring that their decisions align with legal standards and that the rights of affected parties are safeguarded. A ruling based on arbitrary action or fraudulent activity could potentially violate due process or other legal protections, justifying intervention by the district court.

Conditions such as the presence of legal representation, the consideration of evidence, or the pacing of the trial are generally related to procedural aspects. While they are important factors in a fair hearing, they do not automatically grant grounds for a reversal or remand unless they directly relate to arbitrary actions or fraudulent conduct by the commission.